![]() ![]() But discovery by its very nature is not hands-off. For the "hands-off" experience, it's fine. Indie/college radio DJs do it all the time, but Spotify never does.īut again, Spotify is trying to sell millions of subscriptions for people who just want something to listen to in the car or put on at their dinner party. The algorithms are good at guessing that if I like the Zombies, I'll like the Turtles (which is true) but it never jumps to (for instance) current, contemporary indie/DIY stuff that is influenced by '60s rock and '70s punk. But it's rare that I'm introduced to something new that I like. That's not to say that various curated playlists and algorithmic suggestions are useless. So for "discovery" to be a viable product I think it has to somehow be at least as engaging as any of these more traditional ways. pawing through a stack of records at a flea market listening alone while reading liner notesĥ. And there is no comparison between the one- or two-dimensional "discovery" offered by social media and streaming platforms and the rich discovery experiences of any of the following:Ĥ. For myself and a lot of people I know, discovery is nearly as much a reward as the music itself. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |